Indiana Seed Weblog


News Update
March 24, 2009, 3:51 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Purdue Students to be Honored Monday for New Corn, Soy Innovations
Thirty-three Purdue University students in 12 teams participated in the Indiana Soybean Alliance’s (ISA) 2009 Student Soybean Product Innovation Competition — the largest field of competitors in the soybean checkoff-funded contest in its 15 years of existence.  Nine of those teams also participated in the Indiana Corn Product Innovation Competition — sponsored by Indiana Corn Marketing Council (ICMC) — which is in its first year.  Products judged in this year’s competition include biodegradable garden containers, car wax, cork-like substance, de-icing solution, dissolvable cupcake liner, hydroplaning system, paintball, toilet tissue, biodegradable cigarette filter, soy plastic cup and biodegradable shotgun cartridge casing.

Indiana Crop Values Decrease 12%

The total value of Indiana crops in 2008 decreased 12 percent from a year earlier to $6.16 billion, reports the state field office of USDA’s National Ag Statistics Service.  The total value of corn decreased 24 percent. Corn production decreased 11 percent during 2008, with the average price decreasing from $4.39 in 2007 to $3.75 per bushel in 2008.  Soybean production increased 11 percent while the average price per bushel of soybeans decreased from $10.20 to $9.30 per bushel. The total value of production increased 1 percent.

Sam Turpin – Indiana Association Management



Indiana News Update
November 18, 2008, 6:13 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

No consensus on immigration

 

When it comes to the issue of illegal immigration in Indiana, it seems the only consensus is yes, it’s an issue. How extensive it is, how best to address it and even whether addressing it should be a priority are far from clear. Leaving a solution to federal lawmakers remains the best course.

Farmland receives $500,000
Lt. Governor Becky Skillman announced that 27 rural communities will receive Community Focus Fund (CFF) grants totaling $11,591,980, including a $500,000 Downtown Revitalization Grant for Farmland. The Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs (OCRA) administers the grants, which are funded through the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. This is the eighth round of CFF grants the Lt. Governor has awarded since 2005.

Sam Turpin – Indiana Association Management



THE EMERGENCY ECONOMIC STABILIZATION ACT OF 2008
October 14, 2008, 1:59 pm
Filed under: Legislation, Uncategorized

THE EMERGENCY ECONOMIC STABILIZATION ACT OF 2008

On Friday, October 3, 2008, President Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA). The 451-page EESA authorizes up to $700 billion in new spending authority for the US Secretary of the Treasury to purchase, manage and ultimately dispose of troubled assets. The initial three-page proposal sent to Congress by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson contained few restrictions on how this funding could be spent. The House of Representatives rejected the initial legislation by a vote of 205-228.  The Senate subsequently passed expanded legislation on October 1, 2008, by a vote of 74-25, followed by an affirmative vote in the House of 263-171. The EESA now includes numerous oversight mechanisms, addresses issues related to individual homeowners facing mortgage difficulties, and gives Congress the ability to reject half of the proposed $700 billion in funding.

Troubled Asset Relief Program

Congress has authorized up to $700 billion in funding for a newly created Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). This program gives the Treasury Department the authority to purchase, manage and sell assets on terms acceptable to the Treasury Secretary. The authority to purchase troubled assets expires on December 31, 2009, unless extended by the Secretary for an additional year. There is no sunset on Treasury’s authority to continue to own, manage or sell troubled assets. Use of the funding will be limited to financial institutions that have significant operations in the United States.1

The program will be supervised by a newly appointed Assistant Treasury Secretary, who will serve as the head of a new Office of Financial Stability, under the existing Office of Domestic Finance at the US Treasury.  Mr. Neel Kashkari, a former Goldman Sachs executive, has been named the Interim Assistant Treasury Secretary for Financial Stability.  Mr. Kashkari had served as the Assistant Secretary for International Economics and Development, having joined the Treasury Department in July 2006 as Senior Advisor to Secretary Paulson.

The $700 billion TARP funding will be sequenced in three phases:

·         The first $250 billion will be available immediately.

·         The next $100 billion will be available only after the President submits a declaration of need to Congress. (A vote by Congress is not required to agree or disagree with this declaration.)

·         The final $350 billion will be made available only after both houses of Congress have had 15 days to reject by a majority vote the use of this $350 billion.

The Treasury Secretary is empowered to engage outside contractors and to designate financial institutions as financial agents of the United States government. Importantly, there are few requirements to follow existing federal guidelines in making these selections. The Treasury Secretary is required to establish new guidelines to: (i) identify mechanisms for purchasing troubled assets; (ii) address conflicts of interest; (iii) price these assets; and (iv) select the assets and the criteria for identifying assets to be purchased.2 These guidelines must be made available publicly within the earlier of 45 days after the enactment of the legislation or two business days after the first purchase of troubled assets.

Not less than every 60 days, the General Accounting Office must provide reports to Congress on the performance of TARP. Detailed reporting to Congress is required every time $50 billion or more in funding is used by the Secretary of the Treasury. A separate Office of Special Inspector to oversee the TARP is also created. Participants in TARP will be permitted to challenge the decisions of the Treasury Secretary in federal court only if they can prove the decisions were arbitrary and capricious or represented an abuse of discretion.

Troubled Assets Insurance Financing Fund

The Treasury Secretary must also establish an insurance program for assets that originated or were issued prior to March 14, 2008, including mortgage-backed assets. Upon a request from a financial institution, the Secretary may guarantee timely payment for up to 100 percent of principal and interest, based on terms and conditions set by the Secretary. Although the Treasury Secretary may vary premiums depending on risk, the criteria for determining the premium amount must be made publicly available.

Private Homeowners

To preserve homeowners, the Hope for Homeowners Program is being expanded. The Secretary may use loan guarantees and credit enhancements so loans can be modified to prevent foreclosures. Also, the Secretary can consent to term extensions, rate-reductions and principal write-downs. Federal agencies that own mortgage loans are directed to seek modifications prior to foreclosures. Tenants of rental property are also given greater protections from eviction if there is a foreclosure on the property. These provisions may make it difficult for a property purchaser to obtain title to an unoccupied structure. Under the legislation, homeowners whose debt is discharged before January 1, 2013, will not have this discharge considered as taxable income by the IRS.

Equity Sharing and Direct Investment

The law requires any financial transaction undertaken by Treasury to include some measure of equity sharing to minimize the risk to the government. Essentially, this will allow the federal government to own equity in banks under certain circumstances. For example, when Treasury purchases a troubled asset from a financial institution, it may also receive preferred or non-voting stock in the institution if it is publicly traded or some other senior debt instrument. Treasury may also consider a voluntary program of making direct investments into banks – including healthy ones-in exchange for equity interests.

Executive Compensation

One of the most politically charged provisions in the legislation is the financial compensation provided to top executives of public companies. Under the law, companies that participate in the TARP program may not deduct the amount of salaries and benefits of top executives that exceed $500,000 per year. Golden parachutes for these executives are also subject to increased taxes.3 Although these provisions may not have much of a financial impact on the use of the $700 billion in taxpayer funds, it has resonated politically with Members of Congress.

Mark-to-Market Changes

The Securities and Exchange Commission is expressly granted the authority to suspend mark-to-market requirements if the SEC determines it is appropriate to do so. The SEC is required to undertake a study on the impact of mark-to-market activity within 90 days. The number of news accounts blaming mark-to-market activity for the lack of credit has grown in recent days. Most analysts believe the SEC already has the authority to waive or modify such rules and, on September 29, 2008, the SEC issued a new interpretation of the mark-to-market rule.4

Higher FDIC and NCUA Insurance Limits

In response to extensive lobbying by banks and credit unions, the legislation increases the maximum amount that deposit accounts can be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the National Credit Union Association (NCUA) to $250,000 per account from the prior coverage of $100,000.

Implementing the Law

On October 6, the Treasury Secretary issued three requests for proposals (RFPs) for interested parties to submit bids to become: (i) whole loan asset managers (ii) securities asset managers; (iii) and providers of custodian services. Confidential submissions for each RFP were due by 5:00 pm EST on October 8. These submissions contained information about fees and the backgrounds of key managers. It is expected many applicants will have potential conflicts that will need to be addressed in the final contract.

Among other requirements, whole asset managers must either currently manage a portfolio of at least $25 billion or prove it can handle such a portfolio. Securities asset managers must have at least $100 billion in dollar-denominated fixed-income assets under management and have received an unqualified auditor’s opinion for the last five years. Providers of custodian services must have at least $500 billion in domestic assets under custody.

The Treasury Department will select a number of applicants to continue to a second phase of the RFP in which additional qualification information will be sought from each applicant, possibly under a confidentiality agreement. Applicants who are not selected will not be provided the reasons for not being chosen. In the third and final phase, face-to-face interviews may be required of the finalists. Those ultimately selected will be designated as financial agents of the United States, thereby imposing a fiduciary responsibility on each successful applicant to act in the best interests of the United States.

Financial Stability Oversight Board and Other Oversight

Several new oversight programs will also be established under the legislation. The Financial Stability Oversight Board is being created to oversee the appointment of financial agents, the effect of the plan upon homeowners, and to identify fraud. The Board will consist of the Chairman of the Board of the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Secretary, the Director of the Federal Home Finance Agency, the Chairman of the SEC, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The Financial Stability Oversight Board is required to meet within two weeks of any asset acquisition by the Treasury Secretary. The Board will automatically be dissolved after the last use of the new insurance program or the sale of the last asset originally purchased by the United States. GAO is also required to undertake a study on the impact of leverage on the current financial problems and recommend changes by June 1, 2009. In addition, a new congressional oversight panel is created to oversee all of the new authorities created by the legislation.

Other Points of Interest

Notably, a bankruptcy “cramdown” provision favored by some Members of Congress is not included. This provision would have permitted bankruptcy court judges to modify the terms of mortgage contracts by reducing the amount of principal.

The revised bill also includes tax extender provisions related to the alternative minimum tax (AMT), individual tax provisions and deductions, business tax provisions, tax administration provisions, additional tax relief and other tax provisions, and disaster relief.



Ethanol – Beyond the Hype and Hysteria
May 20, 2008, 7:40 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

By Andy Miller, Indiana Agriculture Director

Pick up any publication today and you will see alarming claims about corn-ethanol driving the world into famine.  Two years ago, the same publications were heralding ethanol as the savior of America’s energy crisis.  The truth is somewhere in between, and it is time for a calm, rational analysis of ethanol’s contributions and limitations.

The best way to begin a rational discussion is to address some of the biggest myths about ethanol.

Myth #1 — Ethanol is a perfect fuel and is the “silver bullet” the U.S. needs. 

 

Ethanol is one part of our overall energy strategy to reduce dependence on foreign oil. Ethanol is on track to displace approximately 10 percent of U.S. fuel usage.  That’s a big deal.  At current crude prices, that means more than $35 billion staying in the United States instead of going to OPEC. 

 

But, there is no “silver bullet” for our nation’s energy crisis. Ethanol does have some real issues, like transportation of the finished product and the impact on other corn-based industries.  But the biggest challenge is addressing these issues with innovative ideas. Too many in the industry want to rationalize the issues away, looking instead through rose-colored glasses.

Myth #2 – Ethanol is driving a world famine and record food prices.

Ethanol is not driving a world famine. The world supply of corn is still greater than demand.  That means we aren’t running out of corn.  In fact, the United States ended the last crop year with almost 9 percent reserve in corn, which is only slightly lower than average.  The corn-consuming industry had become accustomed to much higher reserves of 15-20 percent, which drove corn prices below production costs and the accusation that the U.S. was “flooding” the world market with cheap grain.

 

Undoubtedly, ethanol has contributed to tightened corn supplies and higher corn prices.  But increases in corn price are only partly explained by ethanol and only account for a small increase in retail food prices. An objective analysis determined that ethanol merely contributed to a 0.25 percent increase in U.S. food prices.   The bigger culprits in higher food and corn prices are increased demand for food from growing countries like China, the impact of higher fuel prices on food transportation and a weakened dollar.

Myth #3 -Ethanol is destroying the rainforest.

A group of university researchers have concluded that as the world needs more corn, it can only produce it by using more land, and that land will come only by tearing down the rain forest. This argument fails to recognize the impact of innovation on farming.  For example, in the 1930s the United States had more land in corn production than today, but now we produce 6 times more corn on about 10 percent less land.  Use of improved fertilizers and other genetic innovations has driven this change and will continue to do so.  We don’t need hundreds or millions more acres of land to produce more corn. If anything, the current market pressure is accelerating the rate of innovation with some predicting a doubling of corn yields in the next 10 years.

 

Myth #4 – Ethanol is guzzling water.

 

It takes 3 gallons of water to produce a gallon of ethanol.  It takes 44 gallons of water to refine one gallon of oil. Therefore, to produce a gallon of gas requires 14 times the amount of water that is needed to produce a gallon of ethanol.

A university researcher is now trying to make the argument that it actually takes 1,700 gallons of water to make a gallon of ethanol.  However, he arrives at that number by allocating for point source water, or rainfall.  His number incorporates the amount of rain that falls on a field of corn.  Regardless of how the field is used, the rain will still fall. Through technology and innovation more than 95 percent of all corn is grown with no water other than rainfall.

Corn-ethanol is making a meaningful contribution to our country’s efforts to reduce dependence on foreign oil; without it our imports of refined gasoline would more than double.  Ethanol is not without issues, including the assumption it’s a “silver bullet.”  And ethanol’s success has driven cynics and naysayers to surface.  But the most important thing for Hoosiers to remember is this.  Corn-ethanol, as with all alternative energy, has been a major contributor to new economic vitality bringing more than $2 billion in new investment, hundreds of new jobs and millions in new farm income.  Through innovation we can reduce our dependence on foreign oil and see continued economic growth from agriculture – and that is a fact.

Andy Miller is Indiana’s first Agriculture Director. He was raised on a hog and crop farm in Northeastern Indiana, graduated from Purdue University with a degree in agricultural economics and worked in the food industry before accepting a role in public service.



Immigration Bill News
March 14, 2008, 5:28 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

9:28 p.m.: UPDATE: Immigration bill delayed
A bill to crack down on companies that hire illegal immigrants was sent to a summer study session Thursday night in the Statehouse. A House-Senate conference committee met Thursday evening to discuss a possible compromise between the House and Senate versions of the bill. But committee chairman Sen. Tom Weatherwax, R-Logansport, said lawmakers still had many questions about the effects of the proposal. “We just don’t have a lot of the answers,” he said. Weatherwax said it would be better for lawmakers to send the issue to a summer study committee – and possibly take action next year – than to pass a bill with consequences they don’t fully understand.
http://www.heraldbulletin.com/local/local_story_073193317.htmlNo immigration bill this year in Indiana
Indiana will not pass a bill this year to crack down on businesses that employ undocumented aliens. Sen. Tom Weatherwax, R-Logansport, who chaired a House-Senate conference committee tasked with finding a compromise version of the immigration bill, said that as all heads turn to property taxes in the waning hours of the legislative session, immigration goes on the back burner.
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2008/mar/13/hoosier-lawmakers-still-working-immigration-bill

Immigration bill nears legislative deadline
Friday is the deadline for the legislative session to end, but it was possible that lawmakers could gavel out Thursday night instead. The conference committee planned to meet again later Thursday to discuss options. Bill sponsor Sen. Mike Delph, R-Carmel, was frustrated with the delays, saying they were an effort to kill the legislation. ‘‘It’s a battle between the will of the people and the will of the lobbying community,” Delph said. ‘‘It’s a shame. I hope people wake up and listen to the will of the people.”
http://www.wabashplaindealer.com/articles/2008/03/13/state_news/state2.txt



Mike Peterson, Chairman of ASTA to Speak at the 2007 Corn Belt Seed Conference
October 15, 2007, 2:43 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Peterson 

Mike Peterson is President of Peterson Genetics, Inc. based in Cedar Falls, Iowa.  Peterson Genetics, Inc. is primarily engaged in the licensing of improved soybean genetics to retail seed companies throughout the United States.

 

A graduate of Iowa State University with a degree in Agricultural Business, Peterson is also a past president of the Iowa Seed Association, and past Chairman of the Soybean Division of the ASTA.  In addition to numerous local volunteer boards, he is currently serving on the Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) board of directors.

 

He enjoys spending time with his 5 children, and also loves to golf and run marathons.

 

Sam Turpin

Indiana Seed Trade Association